StandbyDistribution[dist1,{dist2,…,distn}]
represents a standby distribution with component lifetime distributions disti. When component
fails, component
will become active.
StandbyDistribution[dist1,{dist2,…,distn},p]
represents a standby distribution where switching from component
to component
succeeds with probability p.
StandbyDistribution[dist1,{dist2,…,distn},sdist]
represents a standby distribution where the switch component has lifetime distribution sdist.
StandbyDistribution[dist1,{…,{disti,inactive,disti,active},…},…]
represents a standby distribution where the ![]()
component lifetime distribution follows disti,inactive in inactive mode and disti,active in active mode.
StandbyDistribution
StandbyDistribution[dist1,{dist2,…,distn}]
represents a standby distribution with component lifetime distributions disti. When component
fails, component
will become active.
StandbyDistribution[dist1,{dist2,…,distn},p]
represents a standby distribution where switching from component
to component
succeeds with probability p.
StandbyDistribution[dist1,{dist2,…,distn},sdist]
represents a standby distribution where the switch component has lifetime distribution sdist.
StandbyDistribution[dist1,{…,{disti,inactive,disti,active},…},…]
represents a standby distribution where the ![]()
component lifetime distribution follows disti,inactive in inactive mode and disti,active in active mode.
Details
- StandbyDistribution[…,…] represents a system with perfect switching where transitioning between components always succeeds.
- StandbyDistribution[…,…,s] represents a system with imperfect switching. If s is a distribution, it represents that lifetime of the switch; otherwise it represents the probability of a successful transition between components.
- StandbyDistribution[…,{…,Ai,…},…] represents a standby distribution where the

component follows a cold standby distribution Ai when it is active, and does not deteriorate when it is inactive. - StandbyDistribution[…,{…,{Ii,Ai},…},…] represents a standby distribution where the

component follows a warm standby distribution. The component deteriorates following distribution Ii when it is inactive and distribution Ai when it is active. - Any mix of cold and warm standby component distributions can be used.
- The survival function and other properties for StandbyDistribution can be derived from the equivalent TransformedDistribution[expr,dists] with the distribution assumptions dists given by {a1A1,a2A2,…,i2I2,i3I3,…,sS,uUniformDistribution[{0,1}]}.
-
StandbyDistribution[…] TransformedDistribution[…,dists] 
a1+a2+a3+⋯ A1,{A2,A3,…},p a1+ a2Boole[p>u]+a3Boole[p2>u]+⋯ A1,{A2,A3,…},S a1+a2Boole[s>a1]+a3Boole[s>a1+a2]+⋯ A1,{{I2,A2},{I3,A3},…} a1+a2Boole[i2>a1]+a3Boole[i3>a1+a2Boole[i2>a1]]+⋯ A1,{{I2,A2},{I3,A3},…},p a1+a2 Boole[i2>a1∧p>u]+a3Boole[i3>a1+ a2Boole[i2>a1]∧p2>u]+⋯ A1,{{I2,A2},{I3,A3},…},S a1+a2 Boole[i2>a1∧s>a1]+a3Boole[i3>a1+a2Boole[i2>a1]∧s>a1+a2Boole[i2>a1]]+⋯ - StandbyDistribution can be used with such functions as Mean, SurvivalFunction, HazardFunction, ReliabilityDistribution, and RandomVariate.
Examples
open all close allBasic Examples (3)
Define a cold standby system with perfect switching:
𝒟 = StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]], {ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2]]}];PDF[𝒟, t]Mean[𝒟]Compare to a non-standby system:
Plot[{SurvivalFunction[𝒟 /. {Subscript[λ, 1] -> 2, Subscript[λ, 2] -> 1}, t], SurvivalFunction[ExponentialDistribution[2], t]}, {t, 0, 5}]Define a cold standby system with imperfect switching:
𝒟 = StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]], {ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2]]}, p];PDF[𝒟, t]Mean[𝒟]Compare to a non-standby system:
Plot[{SurvivalFunction[𝒟 /. {Subscript[λ, 1] -> 2, Subscript[λ, 2] -> 1, p -> 0.9}, t], SurvivalFunction[ExponentialDistribution[2], t]}//Evaluate, {t, 0, 5}]Define cold and warm standby systems, with inactive failure rate half the active failure rate:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2], Subscript[𝒟, 2half]} = {ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]], ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2]], ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2] / 2]};𝒟c = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {Subscript[𝒟, 2]}];𝒟w = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {{Subscript[𝒟, 2half], Subscript[𝒟, 2]}}];Compute the mean time to failure:
{Mean[𝒟c], Mean[𝒟w]}Compare the survival functions:
Plot[Map[SurvivalFunction[# /. {Subscript[λ, 1] -> 2, Subscript[λ, 2] -> 1}, t]&, {𝒟c, 𝒟w}]//Evaluate, {t, 0, 5}, Filling -> Axis]Scope (17)
Cold Standby and Perfect Switching (3)
Define a cold standby system with three identical components:
𝒟 = StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[λ], {ExponentialDistribution[λ], ExponentialDistribution[λ]}];Mean[𝒟]Define a cold standby system with two different components:
𝒟 = StandbyDistribution[WeibullDistribution[1, β], {ExponentialDistribution[λ]}];Compute the survival function:
SurvivalFunction[𝒟, t]Study a component with three identical components in standby:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2]} = {ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[2]};𝒟 = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {Subscript[𝒟, 2], Subscript[𝒟, 2], Subscript[𝒟, 2]}];data = RandomVariate[𝒟, 10^4];Compare with the probability density function:
Show[Histogram[data, 25, "PDF"],
Plot[PDF[𝒟, x]//Evaluate, {x, 0, 12}, PlotStyle -> Thick]]Cold Standby and Imperfect Switching (4)
A cold standby system where the switch succeeds with probability p:
𝒟 = StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]], {ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2]]}, p];Find the mean time to failure:
Mean[𝒟]Compare perfect switching to imperfect switching where the switch works half the time:
sf = SurvivalFunction[𝒟, t] /. {Subscript[λ, 1] -> 1, Subscript[λ, 2] -> 1 / 2};Plot[{sf /. p -> 0.5, sf /. p -> 1}, {t, 0, 10}]A cold standby system where the switch is modeled by a lifetime distribution:
𝒟 = StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[1], {ExponentialDistribution[1 / 5]}, ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, s]]];SurvivalFunction[𝒟, t]//SimplifyStudy the effect of having worse switches:
Plot[Table[SurvivalFunction[𝒟 /. Subscript[λ, s] -> i, t], {i, {.1, 1, 3, 5}}]//Evaluate, {t, 0, 15}, PlotRange -> {0, 1}]Cold standby system with three components and a switch modeled by a distribution:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2], Subscript[𝒟, S]} = {WeibullDistribution[2, 3], ExponentialDistribution[5], ExponentialDistribution[1]};𝒮 = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {Subscript[𝒟, 2], Subscript[𝒟, 2]}, Subscript[𝒟, S]];data = RandomVariate[𝒮, 10^4];Compare with the probability density function:
Show[Histogram[data, 25, "PDF"],
Plot[PDF[𝒮, t]//Evaluate, {t, 0, 12}, WorkingPrecision -> 20, PlotStyle -> Thick]]A switch modeled with a probability of success:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o], Subscript[𝒟, S]} = {ExponentialDistribution[1 / 2], ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[2], ExponentialDistribution[1 / 3]};𝒮 = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {Subscript[𝒟, 2o], Subscript[𝒟, 2o]}, 9 / 10];data = RandomVariate[𝒮, 10^5];Compare with the probability density:
Show[Histogram[data, {0, 11, 1 / 2}, "PDF"],
Plot[PDF[𝒮, t]//Evaluate, {t, 0, 11}, PlotStyle -> Thick]]Warm Standby and Perfect Switching (3)
Standby system where the component can fail while in standby:
𝒟 = StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]], {{ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2s]], ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2o]]}}];Find the mean time to failure:
Mean[𝒟]System with multiple components that can fail in standby:
𝒟 = StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[1], {{WeibullDistribution[1, 2], ExponentialDistribution[1]}, {ExponentialDistribution[2], ExponentialDistribution[5]}}];Compare the survival function to a cold standby system:
ℛ = StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[1], {ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[5]}];Plot[{SurvivalFunction[𝒟, t], SurvivalFunction[ℛ, t]}//Evaluate, {t, 0, 6}, PlotRange -> {0, 1}, Filling -> Axis]Warm standby system with two components in standby:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o]} = {ExponentialDistribution[1 / 2], ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[2]};𝒮 = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {{Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o]}, {Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o]}}];data = RandomVariate[𝒮, 10^4];Compare with the probability density function:
Show[Histogram[data, {0, 11, 0.4}, "PDF"],
Plot[PDF[𝒮, t]//Evaluate, {t, 0, 11}, WorkingPrecision -> 20, PlotStyle -> Thick]]Warm Standby and Imperfect Switching (4)
Warm standby system where the switch succeeds with a probability p:
𝒟 = StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]], {{ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2s]], ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2o]]}}, p];Compute the mean time to failure:
Mean[𝒟]Warm standby system where the switch has a lifetime distribution:
𝒟 = StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]], {{ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2s]], ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2o]]}}, ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, s]]];Compute the mean time to failure:
Mean[𝒟]Warm standby system where the switch is modeled with a lifetime distribution:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o], Subscript[𝒟, S]} = {ExponentialDistribution[1 / 2], ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[2], ExponentialDistribution[1 / 3]};𝒮 = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {{Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o]}, {Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o]}}, Subscript[𝒟, S]];data = RandomVariate[𝒮, 10^5];Compare with the probability density function:
Show[Histogram[data, {0, 11, 0.4}, "PDF"],
Plot[PDF[𝒮, t]//Evaluate, {t, 0, 11}, PlotStyle -> Thick]]System where the switch succeeds with a probability:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o], Subscript[𝒟, S]} = {ExponentialDistribution[1 / 2], ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[2], ExponentialDistribution[1 / 3]};𝒮 = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {{Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o]}, {Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o]}}, 9 / 10];data = RandomVariate[𝒮, 10^5];Show[Histogram[data, {0, 8, 1 / 3}, "PDF"],
Plot[PDF[𝒮, t]//Evaluate, {t, 0, 11}, PlotStyle -> Thick]]Mixed Warm and Cold Standby Systems (3)
Standby system where the second component can fail while in standby:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o], Subscript[𝒟, 3]} = {ExponentialDistribution[10], ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[2], ExponentialDistribution[3]};Subscript[𝒟, wc] = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {{Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o]}, Subscript[𝒟, 3]}];The system where the second and third component switch places:
Subscript[𝒟, cw] = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {Subscript[𝒟, 3], {Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o]}}];Compare the survival functions:
Plot[{Legended[SurvivalFunction[Subscript[𝒟, wc], t], "Warm first"], Legended[SurvivalFunction[Subscript[𝒟, cw], t], "Cold first"]}//Evaluate, {t, 0, 3}, PlotRange -> {0, 1}, Filling -> Axis]A mixed cold and warm standby system, where the switch succeeds with probability
:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o], Subscript[𝒟, 3]} = {ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[1 / 10], ExponentialDistribution[2], ExponentialDistribution[3]};𝒮 = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {{Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o]}, Subscript[𝒟, 3]}, 0.9];Plot[HazardFunction[𝒮, t]//Evaluate, {t, 0, 5}, PlotRange -> {0, Full}, Filling -> Axis]Generate random numbers and compare with probability density:
data = RandomVariate[𝒮, 10^5];Show[Histogram[data, {0, 6, 1 / 3}, "PDF"],
Plot[PDF[𝒮, t]//Evaluate, {t, 0, 11}, PlotStyle -> Thick]]Standby system where one component can fail while in standby, and a switch with a lifetime:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o], Subscript[𝒟, 3], Subscript[𝒟, S]} = {ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[1 / 10], ExponentialDistribution[2], ExponentialDistribution[3], ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, s]]};𝒮 = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {{Subscript[𝒟, 2s], Subscript[𝒟, 2o]}, Subscript[𝒟, 3]}, Subscript[𝒟, S]];Compare the survival functions with different switch failure rates:
sf = SurvivalFunction[𝒮, t];Plot[Table[Legended[sf /. Subscript[λ, s] -> f, Subscript[λ, s] == f], {f, 0.1, 3.1}]//Evaluate, {t, 0, 4}, PlotRange -> {0, 1}]Applications (2)
The lifetime of a component is exponentially distributed. To improve reliability, a second identical component is acquired. Find the most efficient use of this second component:
𝒟 = ExponentialDistribution[1 / 100];One alternative is a parallel configuration:
ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[x∨y, {{x, 𝒟}, {y, 𝒟}}];Another alternative is a standby configuration, with a switch that succeeds with probability p:
𝒮 = StandbyDistribution[𝒟, {𝒟}, p];Plot the survival function of the two alternatives and compare with the original component, assuming perfect switching:
Plot[Evaluate[Legended[SurvivalFunction[#[[2]], t], #[[1]]]& /@ {{"Component", 𝒟}, {"Parallel", ℛ}, {"Standby", 𝒮 /. p -> 1}}], {t, 0, 400}]Simulate failure times for 30 standby systems and find the best configuration:
μ = NExpectation[t, t𝒮 /. p -> 1];ListPlot[{RandomVariate[𝒮 /. p -> 1, 30], {{0, μ}, {30, μ}}}, Joined -> {False, True}, Filling -> Axis]Check how bad a switch you can use while still being better than a parallel system:
Plot[Evaluate[Legended[SurvivalFunction[#[[2]], t], #[[1]]]& /@ Join[{{"Parallel", ℛ}}, Table[{p == i, 𝒮 /. p -> i}, {i, {0.2, 0.5, 0.8}}]]], {t, 0, 400}]The requirement on the switch to equal a parallel system gets lower with time:
{r} = Quiet[Solve[SurvivalFunction[ℛ, t] == SurvivalFunction[𝒮, t], p]]Plot[p /. r, {t, 0, 400}, AxesOrigin -> {0, 0}, AxesLabel -> {t, p}]Consider a computer server. It requires a power supply, hard drives, a network card, and a router to fulfill its intended function. The power supply is backed by a backup power outlet and a diesel generator in cold standby:
𝒮power = StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[1 / 615], {ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[1]}];The hard drives are in a RAID configuration, which requires 2 out of 3 to work:
ℛhdd = ReliabilityDistribution[BooleanCountingFunction[{2, 3}, {x, y, z}], {{x, LogNormalDistribution[4, 1]}, {y, LogNormalDistribution[3, 1]}, {z, LogNormalDistribution[4, 1]}}];The network card has a second card in standby:
𝒮net = StandbyDistribution[WeibullDistribution[1, 3], {WeibullDistribution[1, 2]}];Two routers are connected in parallel:
ℛrouter = ReliabilityDistribution[a∨b, {{a, ExponentialDistribution[1 / 3]}, {b, ExponentialDistribution[1 / 4]}}];ℛ = ReliabilityDistribution[power∧hdd∧net∧router, {{power, 𝒮power}, {hdd, ℛhdd}, {net, 𝒮net}, {router, ℛrouter}}];The resulting survival function:
Refine[SurvivalFunction[ℛ, t], t > 0]Plot[%, {t, 0, 10}, Filling -> Axis]Compute the mean time to failure numerically:
μ = NExpectation[t, tℛ]Find the probability that the server survives for three months:
Probability[t > 3, tℛ]//NDefine a consumer version that does not contain any redundancy:
𝒟power = ExponentialDistribution[1 / 615];𝒟hdd = ReliabilityDistribution[x∧y, {{x, LogNormalDistribution[4, 1]}, {y, LogNormalDistribution[3, 1]}}];𝒟net = WeibullDistribution[1, 3];𝒟router = ExponentialDistribution[1 / 3];ℛconsumer = ReliabilityDistribution[power∧hdd∧net∧router, {{power, 𝒟power}, {hdd, 𝒟hdd}, {net, 𝒟net}, {router, 𝒟router}}];Compare the survival functions:
Plot[Evaluate[SurvivalFunction[#, t]& /@ {ℛ, ℛconsumer}], {t, 0, 10}, Filling -> Axis]Properties & Relations (9)
Cold standby corresponds to the sum of component lifetimes:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2]} = {ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]], ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2]]};𝒮 = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {Subscript[𝒟, 2]}];𝒯 = TransformedDistribution[x + y, {xSubscript[𝒟, 1], ySubscript[𝒟, 2]}];Compare the survival functions:
SurvivalFunction[𝒮, t]SurvivalFunction[𝒯, t]FullSimplify[%% - %]Cold standby with identical exponentially distributed components is an ErlangDistribution:
𝒮 = StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[λ], {ExponentialDistribution[λ]}];
ℰ = ErlangDistribution[2, λ];SurvivalFunction[ℰ, t]SurvivalFunction[𝒮, t]Simplify[%% - %]Cold standby where component lifetimes follow the ExponentialDistribution corresponds to the HypoexponentialDistribution:
𝒮 = StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]], {ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2]]}];
ℋ = HypoexponentialDistribution[{Subscript[λ, 1], Subscript[λ, 2]}];SurvivalFunction[ℋ, t]SurvivalFunction[𝒮, t]Simplify[%% - %]StandbyDistribution is a special case of TransformedDistribution:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2], Subscript[𝒟, s]} = {ExponentialDistribution[1], ExponentialDistribution[2], ExponentialDistribution[3]};𝒮 = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {Subscript[𝒟, 2]}, Subscript[𝒟, s]];𝒯 = TransformedDistribution[x + y Boole[s ≥ x], {xSubscript[𝒟, 1], ySubscript[𝒟, 2], sSubscript[𝒟, s]}];Compare the survival functions:
SurvivalFunction[𝒮, t]SurvivalFunction[𝒯, t]FullSimplify[%% - %]StandbyDistribution is a special case of MixtureDistribution:
{Subscript[𝒟, 1], Subscript[𝒟, 2]} = {ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]], ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2]]};ℳ = MixtureDistribution[{p, 1 - p}, {TransformedDistribution[x + y, {xSubscript[𝒟, 1], ySubscript[𝒟, 2]}], Subscript[𝒟, 1]}];𝒟 = StandbyDistribution[Subscript[𝒟, 1], {Subscript[𝒟, 2]}, p];Compare the probability density function:
PDF[ℳ, t]PDF[𝒟, t]FullSimplify[%% - %, t > 0]StandbyDistribution can be used in ReliabilityDistribution:
𝒟 = ReliabilityDistribution[x∨y, {{x, StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]], {ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2]]}]}, {y, WeibullDistribution[α, β]}}];Compute the survival function:
SurvivalFunction[𝒟, t]ReliabilityDistribution can be used in StandbyDistribution:
𝒟 = StandbyDistribution[ReliabilityDistribution[x∧y, {{x, ExponentialDistribution[2]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[3]}}], {ExponentialDistribution[1]}];data = RandomVariate[𝒟, 10^4];Compare with the probability density function:
Show[Histogram[data, 35, "PDF"],
Plot[PDF[𝒟, x]//Evaluate, {x, 0, 10}, PlotStyle -> Thick, PlotRange -> All]]StandbyDistribution can be used in FailureDistribution:
𝒟 = FailureDistribution[x∧y, {{x, StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 1]], {ExponentialDistribution[Subscript[λ, 2]]}]}, {y, WeibullDistribution[α, β]}}];Compute the survival function:
SurvivalFunction[𝒟, t]FailureDistribution can be used in StandbyDistribution:
𝒟 = StandbyDistribution[FailureDistribution[x∧y, {{x, ExponentialDistribution[2]}, {y, ExponentialDistribution[3]}}], {ExponentialDistribution[1]}];data = RandomVariate[𝒟, 10^4];Compare with the probability density function:
Show[Histogram[data, 35, "PDF"],
Plot[PDF[𝒟, x]//Evaluate, {x, 0, 10}, PlotStyle -> Thick, PlotRange -> All]]Possible Issues (1)
Component distributions need to have a positive domain:
𝒮 = StandbyDistribution[NormalDistribution[6, 2], {ExponentialDistribution[3]}];SurvivalFunction[𝒮, x]Use TruncatedDistribution to restrict the domain to positive values only:
𝒮 = StandbyDistribution[ExponentialDistribution[3], {TruncatedDistribution[{0, ∞}, NormalDistribution[6, 2]]}];SurvivalFunction[𝒮, t]Related Guides
History
Text
Wolfram Research (2012), StandbyDistribution, Wolfram Language function, https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/StandbyDistribution.html.
CMS
Wolfram Language. 2012. "StandbyDistribution." Wolfram Language & System Documentation Center. Wolfram Research. https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/StandbyDistribution.html.
APA
Wolfram Language. (2012). StandbyDistribution. Wolfram Language & System Documentation Center. Retrieved from https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/StandbyDistribution.html
BibTeX
@misc{reference.wolfram_2026_standbydistribution, author="Wolfram Research", title="{StandbyDistribution}", year="2012", howpublished="\url{https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/StandbyDistribution.html}", note=[Accessed: 12-June-2026]}
BibLaTeX
@online{reference.wolfram_2026_standbydistribution, organization={Wolfram Research}, title={StandbyDistribution}, year={2012}, url={https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/StandbyDistribution.html}, note=[Accessed: 12-June-2026]}